Resection of a chest wall mass- surgical technique and peri-operative analgesia

12959354_10153530931267960_1853416198_o-200x300

Dr Vladislav Zlatinov

Corresponding authors :

Dr. Vladislav Zlatinov, Dr. Aglika Yordanova (Clinical pathologist), Dr. Nadejda Petrova (Anaesthetist)

 

Central Veterinary Clinic

Chavdar Mutafov str, 25 B, Sofia, Bulgaria

 

Introduction

 

Rib tumors are uncommon in small animals. Osteosarcoma (OSA) is the most common (73%). Other types include chondrosarcoma (CSA), fibrosarcoma (FSA), hemangiosarcoma (HSA).

Rib tumors tend to occur in large breed dogs and the usual location is in the costo-chondral junction. Radiographic changes include lysis, sclerosis, or a mixture of lytic and blastic patterns. Intra-thoracic invasion of adjacent pericardium and lung lobes is relatively common, so CT scans are recommended to determine the location and extent of the tumor, planning of the surgical resection, and clinical staging for pulmonary metastasis1.

 

Chest wall resection is recommended treatment for the rib tumors 2. The surgical approach is the identical to intercostal thoracotomy, but caudal and cranial margins include a minimum of one intercostal space and rib, while ventral and dorsal margins should be a minimum of 2 cm from the tumor.  Because of the large defect present, a need for autogenous and/or prosthetic reconstruction techniques is often necessary. Autogenous reconstruction techniques include the latissimus dorsi and external abdominal oblique muscles, and diaphragmatic advancement following resection of caudal rib tumors 3. Prosthetic reconstruction with non-absorbable polypropylene mesh, alone or in combination with autogenous techniques, is recommended for large defects. Autogenous reconstruction is preferred in humans because of a high complication rate associated with prosthetic mesh, such as infection and herniation. These complications are rarely reported in dogs following chest wall reconstruction with prosthetic mesh. Up to six ribs can be resected without affecting respiratory function in dogs 4.

Thoracic surgery in small animals is considered a painful procedure, resulting in alterations in pulmonary function and respiratory mechanics. Appropriate analgesic protocol may improve outcomes. Systemic administration of opioids and NSAIDs, intercostal and intrapleural blocks, and epidural analgesia are among the most common options for pain management after thoracic surgery in small animals 5.

 

 

Case report

 

A 10 years old male pitbull dog, weighting 24 kg was presented to us. The owners had been to three veterinary consultations before, the chief complaint being lameness at the right front limb. The cause was suggested to be a “lump” on the right thoracic wall. Based on an X- rays study and clinical examination, so far the owners were discouraged to pursue the further surgical treatment, because the procedure was supposed to be too aggressive and painful. The dog was prescribed palliative NSAIDs therapy.

 

 

Clinical examination

 

Fig1

Fig.1

We did a thorough clinical exam, revealing normal behaviour, good over-all body condition; signs of multiple joint arthritic diseases were found- elbows and stifles decreased ROM and capsules thickening. On the right cranio- ventral thoracic wall we found protruding, egg- size oval mass, widely and firmly connected to the rib cage (Fig.1).

 

 

 

Diagnostics

 

Radiograph of the right elbow revealed advanced elbow arthritic changes.

Fig 2

Fig.2

Additionally, orthogonal thoracic radiographs (+ oblique one) were done, demonstrating large infiltrating mass, with heterogenous lytic and proliferative mineralised pattern, originating at the costo-chondral junction of the 4-th rib (Fig.2).

 

 

 

 

 

unnamed

Fig.3

A fine needle aspiration was done and evaluated (Fig.3).

The pathologist remarks:

“Clusters of  fusiform mesenchymal cells, with obvious signs of malignancy- pleomorphism, increased anisokaryosis and anisocytsosis, basophilia, multinucleated cells . Occasional osteoclasts, macrophages and neutrophils were noted. No osteoid/chondroid was found in the examined material. The tumor was classified as malignant mesenchymal– fibrosarcoma, chondrosarcoma or osteosarcoma.”

 

 

Fig4

Fig.4

A computer tomographic study was accomplished and the mass’s margins investigated carefully. A mineralised tumor centre (from the distal third of the 4-th rib) was found; also soft tissue aggressive expansion in the neighbour intercostal spaces -3-th and 5-th. Typically for the chest wall masses, there was an eccentric growth- the 2/3 of the mass volume protruding into the throracic cavity, extruding the pulmonary parenchyma and contacting the heart on the right side. No lung metastases were noticed on the scans (Fig.4, video 1).

 

Complete blood work was done and found normal. Including normal Alkaline Phosphatase level, considered favorable prognostic factor.

 

After a discussion with the owner, a decision for surgical resection was made.

 

 

Anesthetic protocol

 

Premedication with Medetomidine and Butorphanol was used, followed by Propofol induction. The maintenance was sustained by Isoflurane and Ketamin drop in the fluid sack.

 

Peri-operative analgesia, Anesthetists remarks

 

fig 5

Fig.5

fig 6

Fig.6

The thoracic wall resection is considered very painful procedure, so a corresponding analgesic strategy was built and applied. A continuous post operative segmental epidural analgesia application was provided. T13—L1 epidural puncture (by Tuohy needle), was done and an epidural set catheter (B. Braun) was inserted till the 5-th thoracic vertebra(Fig.5-6). The catheter was safely attached and maintained for 48 h post op, during the patient’s stay in the clinic. The agent delivered through, was Levobupivacain (0,5 %), one 1ml every 4 hours, including pre op.

 

 

After the mass removal, a soaker catheter was sutured at the ribs resection edges; another one was applied between the skin and muscle flap, covering the defect. Both catheters were connected to an elastomeric pump (B. Braun), delivering locally 5 ml/h of 1% Lidocain for 96h (including outpatient period) post operatively.

 

The rationale behind additional soaker catheters was to suppress maximally the nociception transfer, including the sensation through the non- blocked cervical spinal nerves. Also we contemplated- removal of epidural catheter at the time of discharge, but leaving the delivery pump, providing residual local analgesia.

 

Cimicoxib (Cimalgex) was prescribed for 10 days post op. No opioids were used in the recovery period.

 

 

 

Surgical protocol (surgeon remarks)

 

Fig7

Fig.7

Fig 8

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 9

fig10

Fig10

After macroscopic mapping and drawing, a rectangular shaped, full thickness (skin, muscle, ribs and pleura) en bloc excision was done (Fig.7).  This included partial ostectomy of 3-th, 4-th and 5-th ribs. Caudal intercostal thoracotomy was performed first, permitting evaluation of the intrathoracic extent of the tumor. Special attention was applied at the proximal approach to ligate safely the three intercostal arteries and veins. No visceral lung pleural or pericardium adhesion were noticed. Careful electrocautery haemostasis was done at the muscles’ cut edges.  The removed mass was macroscopically evaluated for “clean” margins, and a reconstruction of the large defect was preceded (Fig.8). A double (folded) polypropylene mesh (SURGIPRO®TYCO) was sutured to the wound edges, using simple interrupted pattern (3-0 PDS material). A latissimus dorsi muscle flap was advanced to cover and “seal” the defect (Fig.9). The air content was evacuated with aspirator on the final closure; no chest drain was left in the thorax. Two soaker catheters were applied in the wound; the skin was closed by double pedicle advanced flap technique and simple interrupted pattern (Fig.10).

 

 

 

 

Post operative care and follow up

 

 

 

Fig 11

Fig. 11

The dog’s chest was loosely bandaged; the elastomeric pump and epidural catheter were securely fixed to the body(Fig.11). I.v. antibiotics and fluid support was continued for 24 hours post op.

Provided very effective local analgesia- the dog revealed excellent comfort immediately after the surgery (video 2,3,4). We paid special attention to any pain signs- excessive vocalization, hyper-excitement, panting, tachycardia, behavior abnormalities, etc. No such were present and the patient started eating the next day after surgery; it was discharged 48 after the procedure. No ambulation deficits were seen with the Levobupivacain application. The elastomeric pump was removed on the 4-th day. Mild to moderate serosanguineous discharges from the wound were present for 10 days after the surgery.

On the 14 days recheck the wound was healed and the sutures were removed; the patient showed excellent clinical recovery (Fig.12).

 

 

 

 

Discussion

 

 

The surgical excision is considered the first treatment of choice for malignant rib tumors, but a question about the long term prognosis and rationale behind an aggressive surgery could be raised. As mentioned above, the most common rib tumors are osteosarcomas (OS)  and chondrosarcomas(CS). They have quite different prognosis- OS is rarely cured, whereas CS could be cured with surgery alone. Dogs with osteosarcoma that have elevation of the Alkaline phosphatase level have a much lower median survival times 6. Chemotherapy significantly increases the survival of dogs with rib OS- from a few months to about 9.5 months. Roughly survival time is increased 4 times with chemotherapy + radical resection, compared to surgery alone. Chondrosarcomas have a very good chance to be cured with surgery alone with median survival times exceeding 3 years. The other common type -fibrosarcoma and hemangiosarcoma have intermediate metastatic potential between the other two. Survival times ranging from 120-450 days with chest wall resection alone 7.

 

Dealing with motivated owners, a patient in good general health, with normal AP, and need for moderately large rib case resection size, we found good indications for tumor removal without preliminary histological verification. We suggested acceptable life expectancy in the worst tumor type scenario (the option for chemotherapy was available). While respecting previous vets’ opinions, we took into consideration the stated in the literature fact that dogs tolerate removal of a large portion of the rib cage very well.

 

Despite all this encouraging decision making facts, we would have fought ethical issues in a scenario we weren’t able to provide sufficient peri-operative analgesia of the patient. Except the ethical side, the pain associated with thoracoectomies may have potentially lethal consequence for the patient cardiopulmonary status after surgery. A thoracoectomy requires a very painful excision, involving multiple muscle layers, rib resection, and continuous motion as the patient breathes. Sub-optimal management of pain has major respiratory consequences. Inspiration is limited by pain, which leads to reflex contraction of expiratory muscles, and consecutively to diaphragmatic dysfunction (decreased functional residual capacity and atelectasis, hypoxemia).Treatment of acute post-thoracotomy pain is particularly important not only to keep the patient comfortable but also to minimize pulmonary complications 8.

 

In the veterinary literature there are suggestion for various types of analgesia provided after thoracotomies-  intercostal blocks, intrapleural lidocaine, incisional pain soaker catheters9; systemic agents as NSAIDs, opioids, NMDA antagonists (ketamine),etc. There is plenty of space for objective evidence based studies, proving the best analgesic protocol, yet.

In the presented case we applied sophisticated but uncommon noxious stimulus blockage strategy. The thoracic epidural catheter insertion is technically demanding procedure but it is very powerful tool for both intra and post operative pain control 10. Even more, it allows even preemptive pain blockage. So-called preemptive analgesia is intended to prevent the establishment of central sensitization caused by surgery induced injuries. Evidence from basic research has indicated that analgesic drugs are more effective if administered before, rather than after, a noxious stimulus.  Human studies report that the area of post-thoracotomy pain is more discrete and largely restricted to the site of surgery. Hence, any benefit of preemptive epidural analgesia is, theoretically, more apparent in thoracic surgery than in abdominal surgery.

 

It is interesting if the present tumor or the arthritic elbow lesions caused the primary clinical sign- front right leg lameness. Lameness of the forelimb had been described with costal tumors, located within the first four ribs 11. Possible mechanism is pain translation to the nerves to the limb, mechanical interference with movement or invasion into the muscles of the forelimb. After the surgical excision the owners reported lameness disappearance, supporting the tumor as the real cause.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

Excision of malignant chest wall masses could be very successful. It is feasible to achieve clean cut margins; large residual wall defects could be managed with combined reconstruction techniques. Never mind the aggressive character of the procedure, an excellent patient comfort should be achieved with a combination of thoracic epidural and local wound nerve nociception blockage, as in this case.

 

 

Comments:

 

Just before the submission of this case report the histopathology result was received. It concluded:

 

Mass, originating from spindeloid to pleomorphic cells, highly cellular. The cells were round, organized in bundles and solid formations. There was moderate to marked anisokaryosis and anisocytsosis; mitotic figures frequently present, multifocally there is osetoid production.

 

Diagnosis: Malignant pleomorphic neoplasia, suspicious for osteosarcoma.

 

Long term prognosis:

 

In the case, no local recurrence is expected because of the wide margins excision. Generally the median survival time (MST) for dogs with rib OSA is 90-120 days with surgery alone and 240-290 days with surgery and adjunctive chemotherapy, and death is caused by distant metastases.  Age, weight, sex, number of ribs resected, tumor volume, and total medication dose do not influence survival disease-free interval 12.

 

A chemotherapy protocol is already being contemplated:

Carboplatin 300mg/sq.m.; 4 treatments q 21 days (Withrow and MacEwen Small Animal Clinical Oncology,2007)

 

 

If available, the long term result and the survival time of the patient will be followed and shared through the journal.

VOG? WHO ARE VOG? Meeting with 4 real orthopedic vets from The Balkans

 

12920269_10154232953943738_6628739641829730688_n

https://www.vog-vet.org/

Dr Mario Kreszinger, Croatia

Dr Vladislav Zlatinov, Bulgaria

Dr Marko Novak, Slovenia

Dr Zoran Loncar, Serbia

 

  1. Who are you?

 

 Dr Zoran Loncar:

10698593_10203534440535771_1510276061084451082_n-238x300

Dr Zoran Loncar

My name is Zoran Loncar I am a vet who dedicated his professional life to improve the knowledge and to push the borders of veterinary science.

 

 

Dr Vladislav Zlatinov:

I graduated from University of Forestry- Sofia, in 2005. I started externship attendance in a private small animal practice quite early-since my second year. Right now I am one of the chief surgeons in the Central Veterinary Clinic, Sofia- one of the busiest 24/7 practices in the region. Working already 6 years in this sophisticated facility, I had the chance to master skills and advance in the field of small animal surgery, and particularly orthopedics. I am happy to be involved in BAVOT (Bulgarian Association Veterinary Orthopedics and Traumatology)- the very first specialized guild vet organization in BG. We feel proud to be quite active and have organized some really great seminars, already.

12959354_10153530931267960_1853416198_o-200x300

Dr Vladislav Zlatinov

At present, my focused interest is regional implementation of advanced care standards in the veterinary orthopedics- popularizing the routine use of minimally invasive technique (arthroscopy), Canine Total Hip Replacement and one special pioneering project- “Feline amputee prosthesis”.

 

Dr Marko Novak:

marko-poza

Dr Marko Novak

I am a vet working in a private small animal clinic Klinika Loka in the city Škofja Loka in Slovenia. I graduated in 2006 on School of Veterinary medicine in University of Ljubljana. Since than I finished multiple courses in Orthopedics and Neurology including four years of an ESAVS program, AOVet courses, ESVOT etc. Most of my today’s work are referring patients from other clinics. Concurrently I am a board member of VOG and a treasurer of VOG and active speaker and table instructor on Orthopedic courses.

Dr Mario Kreszinger:

11025153_650927588345571_3484073747581907266_n

Dr Mario Kreszinger

Prof. Mario Kreszinger, DMV, MS, PhD
Veterinary Faculty, University of Zagreb

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. What is VOG? What VOG means to you?

    vog

    VOG

 Dr Zoran Loncar:

VOG is a newborn that was created out of the frustration of the vets that are dealing in every day practice with neurology and orthopedic cases.

The idea was born after continuing education that we organized all around the world.

What we realized is that probably majority of orthopedics surgeries are done by general practitioners. The problem is that they don’t have guiding and possibility always to improve the skills.

This is what we found as a major frustration not only in east countries but also in developed ones. VOG role is to connect the knowledge, mentorship and to come close to the people who do orthopedics and neurosurgery in the practicesDr Zoran Loncar, Serbia.

Dr Vladislav Zlatinov:

When I joined the Veterinary Orthopedic and Neurology Group (VOG), I felt very thrilled. This newborn professional organization will face a bright future. It could not be different with so great open-minded co-founders, sharing the same sincere intentions.

The cradle of VOG may be Eastern Europe, but it is not confined geographically. It is open for all colleagues, interested in never ending process of learning and sharing. Standing for the evidence based approach, the group will encourage members to involve in clinical researches, too.

Nevertheless, the organization is focused just on veterinary orthopedics and neurology, the topics are still greatly diverse and laborious to explore. Unifying and sharing experience is the “enzyme” that fastens the growth of any vet community knowledge. Initiative like VOG may only make us better professionals and is a great chance for many new friendships to be started.

Dr Marko Novak:

A group of enthusiastic veterinarians who want to broaden the “knowhow” to other enthusiastic veterinarians in the region. By learning we evolve, by learning from those farther ahead and following “lege artis” we prosper as veterinary society.

Dr Mario Kreszinger:

VOG is regional orthopaedic Association established to promote and  organize orthopaedic, neurological and traumatological education with objective to connect the members and provide cooperation among each others. Establishing close contact and thrue friendship is one of main goal.15179126_666002020248637_6675110090243320994_nvog-1

 

  1. What means to be an orthopedic vet nowadays?

 Dr Zoran Loncar:

To be and orthopedic surgeon nowdays means that you learn and improve your knowledge and skills on a daily bases. The orthopedics is a mixture of knowledge and manual skills. That needs every day practice. On the other hand there is always a need to follow the new evidence based data in order to be updated.

Dr Vladislav Zlatinov:

The veterinary orthopedics was and still is tough field to work in, sometimes with quite ungratefully unforgiving obastcles. I have seen these: the vet staff staring at a radiograph with broken plate and shaking their heads meaningfully. Rarely you can see this with soft tissue surgeons’ work J

Indeed, the veterinary orthopedic surgeon is a person with serious proffesional responsibilties. Often, his work is not a matter of death or life. But almost always it affects the animal’s quality of life for many years. The job conatains a lot of not so obvious ethical issues behind many clinical decisions taken.

Speaking about “Nowadays”, there is a burst of companies that produce orthopedic implants and tools. Fortunately most of the products are faboulosly good and gives us a chance to help aniamls with “untreatable” conditions in the past. But for me I this also may raise a danger. Just because of a commercial emphasis, we can start easily implement new products without any evidence based justification. For me, there should be a carefull and responsible approach to the “ Fancies” in the sea of products offered to us.13245311_10206690540562329_7499136046518137278_n11986412_10153245936142960_4086193550529382361_n

Dr Marko Novak:

Well for one thing I am absolutly sure it takes a whole person ready to work, ready to work even more and finally uncompromisingly ready to work some more. :) And after you are finished working there comes a night shift… It takes a very, very loving and understanding wife. 😉
There comes a day when you want to quit but it always comes the next day when you want to get back and help some more. But I assume it is the same in any profession.

Dr Mario Kreszinger:

Being an Orthopaedist is one of the highest step in Veterinary speciality.

 

  1. What do you think about the level of veterinary orthopedic on The Balkans?

 

 Dr Zoran Loncar:

Unfortunately the level of knowledge at Balkan countries is low. The reason is old fashioned veterinary schools, the lack of continuing education at the field.

Dr Vladislav Zlatinov:

Our present status has a lot to do with the historical development of the region. I guess it is right to say that I am part of the “new generation” vets. At least in Bulgaria, this generation inherited the experience of very few small animal practitioners, working in the 90-ies. Unfortunately we cannot say that we have a long medical tradition in small animal care, as most Western Europe countries. But.. one way or another a new era has started. For me in the last ten years, the Balkan veterinarians put a hard work and did a huge development in every aspect of their work. The market was opened for Eastern Europe, the pet owners just demand and receive much better care. This includes also us- the orthopedic fellows in the region. I think that we already do quite a good job, with a real potential to shine for excellence

Dr Marko Novak:

I believe it has tremendously spiked in the last few years. There are still reserves, which is good. But what is most important is that people are more than willing to learn. Big thanks to many “good guys” who started teaching especially great orthopedic specialists like Allesandro Piras and Bruno Pierone, Massimo Petazoni etc.

Dr Mario Kreszinger:

The level is right now in extremely high learning curve, coresponds with highly developed western Countries.

 

  1. Your ” golden rules “to be professional orthoped ?

 

 Dr Zoran Loncar:

Learn, practice, learn, control your ego, learn, think out of the box and at the end, learn.
Dr Vladislav Zlatinov:

To be a good orthopedic, demands a lot. Vast stock of knowedge, skilled hands,  attention to the small details. Usually it takes so many years to develop qualities, a great determination is needed to bare the road. And the learning never stops. But this is the common knowledge. I am a believer that to become an especial orthopedic, you should be able to think “out of the box”. We should follow the great minds’ work, but there is always a place for personal contribution.  We should dare to fight paradigms; this is an essential “fuel” for medical science evolution.

Fianlly, our profession never works “good” without a sincere empathy to animals and fare etthical attitude to them and their owners15181147_10154094081597960_611406697039840077_n15181178_10154094095972960_9093230231692850684_n

Dr Marko Novak:

Be precise, train, learn, ask, always try to find mistakes and be better the next time, be objectively sharp to your work, take time for your family and for yourself. Charge your batteries regularly.

Dr Mario Kreszinger:

Be competely dedicated to your job with all efforts and breit knowledge.15181250_10154094080692960_1411178589932869639_n

 

 

  1. What do you think about  the online journal Vets on The Balkans?

Dr Zoran Loncar:

Vets on the Balkan is refreshment and result of people with good energy and wish to improve our region. We live in small countries and if we cooperate together we have better chance to improve ourselves.

 

Dr Vladislav Zlatinov:

It is so great to have such a professional forum, connecting Balkans (and not only) vets! I literally see people from different countries in the region, getting to know each other because of your journal.  The “Vets on The Balkans” deserve all the compliments for your great positive initiative and work!

Dr Marko Novak:

I came across VTB when I was scrolling down the facebook and I saw these interesting articles from guys doing great job. I think it is one of those starters that help people to become better at what they do.

Dr Mario Kreszinger:

It very usefull easy approachable source of infos we need in everyday Jobs routine.12072565_1159080807469853_2466737431594238709_n

 

 

 

 

Total hip replacement after unsuccessful femoral head and neck resection in large mix breed dog

12959354_10153530931267960_1853416198_o

Dr. Vladislav Zlatinov

Corresponding author :

Dr. Vladislav Zlatinov,
Central Veterinary Clinic
Chavdar Mutafov str, 25 B, Sofia, Bulgaria
E-mail: zlatinov_vet@yahoo.com

Key words : Total hip replacement, FHNO revision, Biomedtrix universal hip system, BFX, CFX

 

Abstract

 

This a case report of successful revision of femoral head and neck ostectomy (FHNO) with hybrid BioMedtrix (Boonton, NJ) total hip replacement (THR) system, in a 7 years old mix dog. The revision indications in the case were chronic pain and functional impairment after previous excision arthroplasty for severe coxo-femoral arthritis. The weight of the patient (43kg), incomplete resection of the femoral neck and concomitant orthopaedic condition (elbow osteoarthritis) could had been contributing factors for the FHNO bad outcome. A preoperative computer tomographic (CT) study was used for underlaying cause exploration and planning the replacement arthroplasty. The time window between the two surgeries was unusually long- three years. This had caused serious morphological alterations and made the surgery of upmost technical difficulty. Nevertheless, the revision of FHNE to THR produced marked clinical improvement and return to normal activity within 3 months after surgery.

Introduction

 

THR is a salvage procedure involving replacement of a diseased pelvic acetabulum and femoral head with implants. Common diseases which necessities this advanced bionic surgery are osteoarthritis, secondary to hip dysplasia or trauma, aseptic femoral head necrosis, acute or chronic hip luxation, failed FHNO, irreparable acetabular or femoral head fracture.
Actually, the canine THR became commercially available since 1974 (Hoefle) and huge advancements in canine and feline THR have been made in the past 30 years. At the present, two cementless commercial systems are most popular, and several other under development1.
The Zurich Cementless Hip Prosthesis (Kyon, Switzerland) provides immediate fixation of the acetabular cup by a press-fit insertion (plus option for screw fixation); Locking screws are used for immediate fixation of the femoral stem, and on growth of bone provides long-term stability.
The BioMedtrix biologic fixation system (BFX) is a modular, press-fit bone ingrowth system with an unsecured acetabular component that provides the advantage of size compatibility with the components of the BioMedtrix cemented THR system (CFX). The advantages of application hybrid THR are discussed further in the case report.
Implants design and procedures in canine THR have been well reviewed in the literature. There are several studies reporting the functional outcomes and complications.2,3 Over- all excellent clinical results and reasonable (2-5%) major complications occurrence are reported by the experienced surgeons in the field.
Never mind the specific implant system used, the THR surgery should achieving the ultimate goal of relieving pain and improve the patient’s quality of life by returning normal limb function. Optimally, the functional effect and the integrity of the prosthesis should last for a lifetime. Serious complications- that could be met in the procedure should be avoided by precise surgery planning and perfect aseptic and surgical technique.
Femoral head and neck ostectomy (FHNO) is alternative low- cost salvage procedure. It intend to eliminate bone-to-bone contact of the diseased acetabulum and femoral head, through the formation of a pseudoarhrosis composed of non-painful fibrous connective tissue.
Published reports about outcome results after FHNO have been controversial. These ones based on gross veterinarian observations or client questionnaires, show encouraging improvement in clinical signs for the majority of dogs.
The more objective gait analysis data (available only recently4,5,6,7) didn’t reveal so optimistic results. Not ideal outcome in function was most evident in studies that did not rely only on owner satisfaction. Common residual dysfunctions after FHNO include: persistent lameness, restricted hip ROM , limb shortening, decreased stifle and hock angulation and muscle atrophy. The maximum functional recovery from the procedure may take up to 8 months6,7,8. Logically, the functional outcome of FHNO is affected by surgical technique, severeness of the disease, age, post op physical therapy and body weight 9. Several clinical trials suggest lack of constant results in dogs heavier than 18 kg.10,11,12 . The cause of the suboptimal outcome in larger dogs is still controversial. Some studies blame the bone-to-bone contact from inadequate excision or postoperative bone proliferation13,14; Others suggest that the bone contact is commonly found after FHNO and do not explain the different clinical outcomes15,16.
In cases of unacceptable pain relief, following FHNO, a revision osteotomy could be contemplated to correct a residual bone-to-bone contact, if present. A more aggressive ostectomy (including trochanter minor) or usage of muscle flaps “slings” modifications could be used to improve the outcome, again with unpredictable outcomes12,17. Another viable option could be conversion to THR18,19,20 . Nevertheless, revisions to THR were reported to yield good and pain-free function (Gofton, 1982; Liska et al. 2010, Fitzpatrick et al. 2012) many obstacles lay in front of successful procedure. The presence of unstructured fibrous tissue and altered anatomy at the surgery site complicates the surgery, and manipulation of a previous surgical site increases the risk of infection. After an excision, the acetabulum fills in with bone and the proximal femur remodels with bone resorption at the excision surface and sclerotic bone production in the medial proximal endoosteal surface. Complications are more likely after revision of FHNO, so dogs that are initially better candidates for a THR, should not be offered excision as an interim procedure.

 

Case report

A 7 years old female mix breed dog (43kg) was presented for consultation because of chronic left hind leg lameness. A femoral head and neck excision was accomplished 3 years ago, but the patient never show adequate pain-free recovery afterwards, despite persistent usage of anti-inflammatory medications.

 

Disease history

The patient had a history of previous surgeries (Fig.1-2)- left hip luxation was treated by toggle-pin reduction technique, five years ago. At the same traumatic incident, right intra articular ulnar fracture was diagnosed and osteosynthesis with neutralisation plate was applied. Despite the successful healing, degenerative joint changes developed gradually in the elbow afterwards.rtindex1

In the previously luxated left hip, progression of severe degenerative changes and clinical deterioration towards severe disabling lameness were demonstrated after the treatment. This why, FHNO was accomplished 18 months after the primary trauma (Fig.3). Radiographic signs of osteoarthritis progression were noticed also in the opposite, right hip joint. The primary cause was hip dysplasia, but no painful clinical consequences were confirmed.ij

 

Clinical examination

At the clinical exam we found a moderate (II/IV) left hind leg lameness. (video1). At manipulation the hip demonstrated restricted ROM, with obvious pain and crepitation feeling in extension.We found considerable limb muscle atrophy. The opposite hip also had decreased ROM but no pain was elicited through extension.

A CT imaging was used for better evaluation of the FHNO failure (Video 2). Our clinical and imaging interpretation was- residual bone-to-bone contact, caused by suboptimal FHNO and caudal- distal “under-excised” femoral neck.

 

 

Dorsal displacement of the femur could have exaggerated the residual contact. Schiatic nerve adhesions were not supposed.

A revision with hip replacement arthroplasty was planned.ik

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planning and templating

Preoperatively, magnification-calibrated radiographic study of the femur and pelvis was accomplished. The approximate size of the acetabular cup and femoral stem were determined using acetate template overlaid on radiographs, but with doubts considering the real bone quality of both- the acetabular and femoral components.
Actually, the CT images played a crucial role in the detailed evaluation of the abnormal morphology, present 3 years post FHNO surgery.
Appreciating the femoral component, challenging technical problem was found. A severe proximal femoral canal sclerosis (much more obvious on CT images compared to the pre op X-rays)- Fig.5. This secondary changes always interfere with the well aligned, centralised process of reaming and broaching into the femoral canal. The eccentrically dense bone structure inevitably pushes the canal instruments out of the ideal position, increasing the risk for stem malposition and iatrogenic femoral fracture. This plus the advanced age was appreciated as risk factors for femoral shaft fracture, so a decision for the safer cemented femoral stem (CFX № 7) insertion was made. Because CFX stem have collar, laying against the proximal canal opening, plan was made to correct of the previous FHNO cut, lowering it.pm

Another technical issues were met, evaluating the pelvic component. A flattened, critically shallow acetabulum was found on the CT images, not clearly visible on the radiographs (hidden by the false hoarse bone proliferation). This made the precise cup sizing challenging. The CT (including 3D reconstruction) images, were used for analysis the real bone stock present in the “pseudo acetabulum” area.
The smallest possible cup (24 mmBFX) was templated but still without adequate dorsal bone engagement.

Fortunately, the Biomedtrix THR system offers an unique clinical solution in these difficult cases. Because of the cylindrically shaped press- fit anchoring mechanism , the Biomedtrix BFX cup may offer great stability properties if just adequate cranial and caudal bone contact is achieved. A rarely applied technique of medial acetabulum wall penetration, allows deeper cup insertion , increasing the stability of the implant-Fig.6. vg

This stability is provided by the press-fit cranial and caudal cup edges flush. Logically, the technique demands ideal starting point of the acetabular reaming, because any offset may cause inadvertent dorsal bone loss or devastating acetabular fracture-Fig.7. No option for switching towards cemented cup would be present in these circumstances. So a plan for hybrid THR (BFX cup and CFX stem) was made. Excellent clinical results with hybrid Biomedtrix system were reported (Gemmill TJ, Vet surg, 2011).Untitled-7

 

Surgical protocol

Surgical approach
A standard cranio- lateral approach to the hip joint, including full tenotomy of the deep gluteal muscle, was used. The sciatic nerve was not exposed during the procedure. Advancing through the excessive fibrotic tissue formed at the previous surgical field was extremely challenging and time consuming. It included sharp and blunt tissue dissection. A serious haemorrhage was met from unrecognised arterial vessel in the caudo- distal part of the surgical area. Direct clamping was attempted but not possible, so gauze compression was applied, during the whole procedure.
The replacement arthroplasty was accomplished, following the algorithms and rules provided by the implants manufacturer (more detailed information could be found at http://biomedtrix.com). Only the important technical problems and solutions are described in the following surgery protocol.
A pelvic positioning device was placed underneath the patient, before the aseptic preparation.

Neck resection
A full external femoral rotation to 90 degrees was not possible in the case. The presence of diffuse inelastic fibrotic adhesions, restricted significantly the manipulation of the femur. Two assistants were used to improve the manipulation and retraction at the surgical site. Using a resection guide, aligned with the central axis of the femur, the remnant of the neck was resected according to the preplanned.
A blunt-tipped Hohmann retractor was used to elevate the proximal femur from the wound. Adequate but still more or less suboptimal passage to the canal was achieved.
Femoral canal preparation
Initial opening
The entry point was difficult to visualise because of the solid sclerotic bone, present in the trochanteric fossa. The femoral canal was entered with great care to the alignment, gradually starting with initial 3 mm pin and proceeding with 5 mm drill bit.
Canal preparation
The canal was opened and expanded through reaming of caudal and lateral femoral neck’s walls. Extremely hard cortical bone was found in the caudal and medial femoral neck area. It caused considerable resistance to consequent broaching process. It was physically demanding to resist the tendency of the broach to slide back into malalignment during reinsertion. Small crack fracture (about 3 mm bone fragment) was inevitably caused at the medial wall edge.

No margin of cancellous bone was preserved between the implant and the cortex in the case. Temporary gauze compression of the canal was used to restrict the bleeding, during the following procedure of acteabulum bed preparation. After the BFX cup insertion, the stem was fixed to the femoral canal, using gentamycin impregnated cement.(Biomedtrix 3 G veterinary bone cement) applied by improved pressurised technique (using cement restrictor). No stem centraliser was used in the case.

Acetabular preparation
Meyerding retractors were used to reflected fibrotic soft tissues away of the acetabulum. A Hohmann retractor tip was positioned ventro-caudally of the acetabulum, so a femoral shaft retraction was achieved through a lever arm effect. The visibility to the pelvis was quite satisfactory. An emphasis was put on NOT- starting the acetabular reaming in the dorsally migrated pseudo- acetabulum (nevertheless reliable landmarks were difficult to found). First, the reaming was started approximately 20 degrees to perpendicular, and afterwards changed to the desired cup insertion position. Sequentially larger reamers were used. Very careful and gradual medial wall penetration was accomplished, incrementally testing the acteabular depth with a trial cup. The size of the opening was reasonably big and the periosteum could not be preserved. The toggle pin from a previous surgery was retrieved during the procedure.

Аfter the BFX cup hammering, there was a feeling for solid, and good flushed cup component- Fig.8.index44

 

Post op radiographs evaluation

Excellent implants’ stability and reasonably good orientation were appreciated on the post op X- rays (Fig.9).index55
BFX cup- a mild negative inclination and moderate retroversion was noticed. There was an excellent incorporation within the acetabular bone.
CFX stem- excellently centered in the frontal plane , but caudally tipped in the saggital plane. There was good cement filling, except small cavity in near the medial femoral wall.
Comments
The caudo- distal stem deviation, was probably caused by restricted proximal femur manipulation and suboptimal canal passage availability. It had precluded good alignment broaching and stem insertion- Fig. 10. A potential negative effect of eccentrically placed stems (tip contacting the cortex) could be a creation of stress riser effect and increased risk of femoral fracture, especially if BFX stem is being inserted. The use of cement mold centraliser may had improved the stem orientation, but was unavailable in this case- Fig.11.index8

The small air defect in the cement was probably caused by leakage through the medial wall fragmentation caused intraoperatively.index9

 

Post operative care and follow up

 

Postoperative analgesia included NSAIDs for 4 weeks. The dog was discharged the next day after surgery, with owner instructions for strict cage rest: controlled leash walking only for 10 minutes, 2-3 times daily.
The patient was toe- touching for 5 days post op with gradual increase of the limb usage; real weight bearing 7 days after the surgery. Physiotherapy was restricted to passive range of motion (home exercise).
A close follow-up was performed by phone contact with the owner. Radiographs were repeated at 12 weeks post op- Fig. 12. They revealed good implants stability; a femoral cortex hypertrophy was noticed around the stem tip area. This was appreciated as physiological remodelling due to altered bone stress bearing.index10

 

Results

The patient revealed gradual , but consistent and sustained full clinical improvement. Unrestricted activity was allowed for 12 weeks, when normal (pain free) limb function was appreciated (Video 3). Increased left hind leg muscle mass was found even in this short post op period. Return to normal ROM was found at the recheck (Video 4). Very good perceived quality was reported by the owners.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

Transforming of FHNO to THR is a challenging but viable treatment option, even in severely complicated cases. The Biomedtrix system offers great implants’ design advantages, including combination of hybrid elements; excellent BFX cup anchorage, even in deformed shallow acetabulums.

Difficulties and complications could be faced during the FHNO revisions. These met in this case were manageable, but a higher complication ratio could be expected in similar scenarios. The major causes are the profound morphological changes present after femoral head and neck excision, and the fibrotic adhesions restricting the optimal femoral manipulation during the procedure.

The veterinary professionals , should use FHNO technique wisely, taking into consideration its financial/clinical advantage and disadvantages. The excision arthroplasty should never be suggested as a temporary clinical relief in large breed dogs because more or less it disrupts the normal bio- mechanics, causes length discrepancy and have unpredictable pain relief, requiring prolonged rehabilitation or a revision surgery.
During initial discussions about treatment options, the owners should always be treated fare with evidence based approach and realistically expected results explained. This could protect many dogs from suboptimal functional results, following FHNO recommendation in inappropriate candidates.

REFERENCES
1. Jeffrey N. Peck, Denis J. Marcellin-Little; Advances in small animal total joint replacement ISBN 978-0-470-95961-9
2. Olmstead ML,Hohn RB,TurnerTM:A five-year study of 221 total hip replacements in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983;183:191–194
3. Iwata D, Broun HC, Black AP, et al: Total hip arthroplasty outcomes assessment using functional and radio- graphic scores to compare canine systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 21:221, 2008.

4. BrezonJL,HowardPE,CovellSJ,etal: A retrospective study of the efficacy of femoral head and neck excisions in 94 dogs and cats. Vet Surg 1980;9:88–92
5. Dueland R, Bartel DL, Antonson E: Force-plate technique for canine gait analysis of total hip and excision arthroplasty. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 13:547, 1977.
6. MontgomeryRD,MiltonJL,HorneRD,etal:A retrospective comparison of three techniques for femoral head and neck excision in dogs. Vet Surg 1987;16:423–426

7. GendreauC,CawleyAJ:Excision of the femoral head and neck: the long term results of 35 operations. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977;13:605–608
8. Excision arthroplasty of the hip joint in dogs and cats. Clinical, radiographic, and gait analysis findings from the Department of Surgery, Veterinary Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany. 1997.
9. DuffR,CampbellJR: Effects of experimental excision arthroplasty of the hip joint. Res Vet Surg 1978;24: 174–181
10. Ganz R: A new periarticular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia: technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop 232:26, 1988.
11. Penwick RC: The variables that influence the success of femoral head and neck excision in dogs. Vet Med 87:325, 1992.
12. Mann FA, Tangner CH, Wagner-Mann C, et al: A comparison of standard femoral head and neck excision and femoral head and neck excision using a biceps femoris muscle flap in the dog. Vet Surg 1987;16:223–230
13. Lippincott CL: Improvement of excision arthroplasty of the femoral head and neck utilizing a biceps femoris muscle sling. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 17:688, 1981.
14. Tarvin G, Lippincott CL: Excision arthroplasty for treat- ment of canine hip dysplasia using the biceps femoris muscle sling: an evaluation of 92 cases. Semin Vet Med Surg Small Anim 2:158, 1987.
15. Duff R, Campbell JR: Effects of experimental excision arthroplasty of the hip joint. Res Vet Sci 23:174, 1978.
16. Duff R, Campbell JR: Radiographic appearance and clinical progress after excision arthroplasty. J Small Anim Pract 19:439, 1978.
17. Lewis DD, Bellah JR, McGavin MD, et al: Postoperative examination of the biceps femoris muscle sling used in excision of the femoral head and neck in dogs. Vet Surg 17:269, 1988.
18. Noel Fitzpatrick, Duniv, MVB, CertSAO, CertVR, Laura Pratola, BSc: Total Hip Replacement after Failed Femoral Head and Neck Excision in Two Dogs and Two Cats .Vet Surg 41 (2012) 136–14
19. GoftonN,Sumner-SmithG:Total hip prosthesis for revision of unsuccessful excision arthroplasty. Vet Surg 1982;11:134–139
20. LiskaWD,DoyleND,SchwartzZ: Successful revision of a femoral head ostectomy (complicated by postoperative sciatic neurapraxia) to a total hip replacement in a cat. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010;2:119–123